Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | slatorade | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12772709 |
Golgari Midrange | tchuco | 7-2 | None |
Esper Pixie | junpei nakamura | 8-4 | None |
yusuke kanazawa | 6-2 | None |
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange
Drown in Sorrow ranks #3048 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 59%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Drown in Sorrow is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 4.90 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Drown in Sorrow has a win rate of 55.4%, making it 16.8% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Defile | Instant | 5 | 50.6% | 1 |
Lembas | Artifact — Food | 5 | 50.6% | 1 |
Troublemaker Ouphe | Creature — Ouphe | 5 | 46.3% | 1 |
Snuff Out | Instant | 5 | 45.6% | 1 |
Weather the Storm | Instant | 6 | 42.1% | 1 |
Troll of Khazad-dûm | Creature — Troll | 6 | 42.1% | 1 |
Tithing Blade | Artifact // Artifact | 6 | 42.1% | 1 |
Thorn of the Black Rose | Creature — Human Assassin | 6 | 42.1% | 1 |
Spinning Darkness | Instant | 6 | 42.1% | 1 |
Reckoner's Bargain | Instant | 6 | 42.1% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Drown in Sorrow than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nissa, Worldwaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 5 | 6 | 66.7% | 58.3% | +8.4% |
Murderous Cut | Instant | 5 | 11 | 60.8% | 52.5% | +8.3% |
Glare of Heresy | Sorcery | 2 | 8 | 63.0% | 56.0% | +6.9% |
Elspeth, Sun's Champion | Legendary Planeswalker — Elspeth | 6 | 11 | 62.1% | 55.5% | +6.6% |
Abzan Charm | Instant | 3 | 12 | 59.5% | 53.8% | +5.7% |
Tasigur, the Golden Fang | Legendary Creature — Human Shaman | 6 | 18 | 59.8% | 54.7% | +5.1% |
Stratus Dancer | Creature — Djinn Monk | 2 | 5 | 59.3% | 54.5% | +4.7% |
End Hostilities | Sorcery | 5 | 11 | 58.7% | 54.3% | +4.4% |
Crux of Fate | Sorcery | 5 | 13 | 58.5% | 54.1% | +4.3% |
Virulent Plague | Enchantment | 3 | 6 | 55.6% | 51.3% | +4.2% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 21 | 1.1% | 35.7% |
Golgari Midrange | 12 | 1.4% | 49.3% |
Abzan Pixie | 9 | 23.1% | 36.0% |
Golgari Graveyard | 8 | 11.8% | 21.2% |
3 | 4.8% | 53.1% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.